ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940
COUNSEL:
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability
Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
22 October 2009. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of
Proceedings at Exhibit F.
In December 2009, the applicant requested reconsideration;
however, the Board staff determined his request did not meet the
criteria for reconsideration.
The applicant submitted a DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010,
with attachments, again requesting reconsideration of his case.
He indicates his character disorder and behavior disorder are
medical assessments and violate his privacy by being placed on an
official document. He provides a letter from his clinical
psychologist.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered
the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided
by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the
time of any previous application. However, since no new and
relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not
meet the criteria for reconsideration. As the applicant has been
previously advised, reconsideration is provided only where newly
discovered relevant evidence is presented which was not available
when the application was submitted. Further, the reiteration of
facts we have previously addressed, uncorroborated personal
observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of record
are not adequate grounds for reopening a case. Therefore, in
view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicants request.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2009-00940 in Executive Session on 7 December 2010,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2009-00940 was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 November 2009,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010, w/atch.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00940-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00940
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability- Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. In support of his request, the applicant provided a statement from his psychologist. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00940
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability- Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. In support of his request, the applicant provided a statement from his psychologist. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00790 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicants appeal for reconsideration, he requests his reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 code that...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02990
On 4 February 1976, the Board considered and denied a request from the applicant to amend his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, to include the discharge authority. On 25 September 2008, the Board considered and denied his request for a medical retirement, a change to his narrative reason for separation, RE code, award of the AFGCM, completed basic training, completed career development courses, and promotion to the grade of sergeant. We have...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04570 ADDENDUM
After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find it sufficient to change the Boards earlier determination in this case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02989
On behalf of the applicant, an accredited veterans administration claims agent/veterans advocate, indicated subsequent to the Boards original decision, he was diagnosed with an aggravated chronic mental health condition and was awarded a combined compensable disability rating of 50 percent (Major Depressive Disorder) by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). In this respect, we note that while the two supporting statements indicate the applicant suffers from major depressive disorder...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00270 ADDENDUM
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. By way of undated letter, the applicant requests reconsideration and submits additional supporting documentation for reconsideration. First he was not provided a Medical Evaluation Board assessment while on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00052-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. The applicant submitted a letter, with attachments, requesting reconsideration of his case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00456-2
However, since no new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....